County
of______________
OFFICE OF THE CLERIC
OFFICE OF THE CLERIC
______________ , Michigan
COMMON LAW
VEHICULAR JUDICIAL NOTICE
CONSTITUTIONAL DRIVERS LICENSE
THE
UNDERSIGNED Common Law Citizen_________________________: hereby
Certifies, by Rights Secured under provisions of the Constitution of
the United States of America, the Constitution of the several states,
Common Law, Nature and Laws of Natures GOD, that these Rights are
retained in FEE SIMPLE ABSOLUTE, and held and protected with special
regard to Rights designated and/or set forth as follows: ALSO NOTE
Rights and Property are ONE AND THE SAME THING-by the Honorable
Justice LOUIS BRANDIS U.S. SUPREME COURT.
NOTICE
AND ADVISORY OF RIGHTS CLAIMED INVIOLATE:
1)
The Right to TRAVEL FREELY, UNENCUMBERED, and UNFETTERED is
guaranteed as a RIGHT and not a mere privilege. That the Right to
TRAVEL is such a BASIC RIGHT it does NOT even need to be mentioned
for it is SELF-evident by Common Sense that the Right to TRAVEL is a
BASIC CONCOMMITANT of a FREE Society to come and go from length and
breath FREELY UNENCUMBERED and UNFETTERED distinguishes the
characteristic required for a FREE PEOPLE TO EXIST IN FACT. Please
See SHAPIRO vs. THOMSON, 394 U. S. 618 . Further, the Right to TRAVEL
by private conveyance for private purposes upon the Common way
can NOT BE INFRINGED. No license or
permission is required for TRAVEL when such TRAVEL IS NOT for
the purpose of [COMMERCIAL] PROFIT OR GAIN on the open highways
operating under license IN COMMERCE. The above named Common Law
Citizen listed IS NOT OPERATING IN COMMERCE and as
such is thereby EXEMPTED FROM THE REQUIREMENT OF A LICENSE AS
SUCH. Further, the _______________ state, is FORBIDDEN BY
LAW from converting a BASIC RIGHT into a PRIVILEGE and
requiring a LICENSE and or a FEE CHARGED for the exercise of the
BASIC RIGHT. Please SEE MURDOCK vs. PENNSYLVANIA, 319 U.S. 105, and
if _______________, state doesERRONIOUSLY convert BASIC
RIGHTS into PRIVILEGES and require a License or FEE a Citizen
may IGNORE THE LICENSE OR FEE WITH TOTAL IMMUNITY FOR SUCH
EXERCISE OF A BASIC RIGHT. Please see Schuttlesworth vs.
BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA, 373 U.S. 262. Now if a Citizen exercises a BASIC
RIGHT and a Law of ANY state is to the contrary of such exercise of
that BASIC RIGHT, the said supposed Law of ANY state is a FICTION OF
LAW and 100% TOTALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL and NO
COURTS ARE BOUND TO UPHOLD IT AND NO Citizen is REQUIRED TO OBEY
SUCH UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW OR LICENSE REQUIREMENT. Please
see MARBURY vs. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), which has never been
overturned in over 194 years, see Shephard's Citations. Now further,
if a Citizen relies in good faith on the advice of Counsel and or on
the Decisions of the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT that Citizen has
a PERFECT DEFENSE to the element of
WILLFULNESS and since the burden of proof of said WILLFULNESS is on
the Prosecution to prove beyond a REASONABLE DOUBT, said task or
burden being totally impossible to specifically preform there is NO
CAUSE OF ACTION FOR WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED BY A COURT OF LAW.
Please see U.S. vs. Bishop 412 U.S. 346 . OBVIOUSLY THERE
IS NO LAWFUL CHARGE AGAINST EXERCISING A BASIC Right to TRAVEL for a
regular Common Law Citizen NOT IN COMMERCE on the common way Public
HlGHWAY. THAT IS THE LAW!!! The above named
Citizen IS IMMUNE FROM ANY CHARGE TO THE CONTRARY AND ANY PARTY
MAKING SUCH CHARGE SHOULD BE DULY WARNED OF THE TORT OF TRESPASS!!!
YOU ARE TRESPASSING ON THIS Common Law Citizen!!!
2)
The original and Judicial jurisdiction of the United States Supreme
Court is ALL actions in which a State may be party, thru subdivision,
political or trust. This includes ALL state approved subdivisions
and/or INCORPORATED Cities, Townships, Municipalities, and Villages,
Et Al . Please see Article 3, Section 2, Para. (1) and (2), U.S.
Constitution.
3)
The undersigned has NEVER willingly and knowingly entered into ANY
Contract or Contractual agreement giving up ANY Constitutional Rights
which are secured by the CONSTITUTION, the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND.
This Common Law Citizen has NOT harmed any party, has NOT threatened
any party, and that includes has NOT threatened or caused any
endangerment to the safety or well being of any party and would leave
any claimant otherwise to their strictest proofs otherwise IN A COURT
OF LAW. The above named Citizen is merely exercising the BASIC RIGHT
TO TRAVEL UNENCUMBERED and UNFETTERED on the Common public way or
highway, which is their RIGHT TO SO DO!!! Please see Zobel vs.
Williams, 457 U.S. 55, held the RIGHT TO TRAVEL is
Constitutionally PROTECTED!!
4)
Conversion of the RIGHT TO TRAVEL into a PRIVILEGE and or CRIME is A
FRAUD and is in clear and direct conflict with she
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. LAWS made by
any state, which are clearly in direct CONFLICT or REPUGNANCY
are UNCONSTITUTIONAL and are NOT WITH STANDING IN
LAW AND ARE BEING CHALLENGED AS SUCH HERE AND THEREBY ARE NULL AND
VOID OF LAW ON THEIR FACE. NO COURTS ARE BOUND TO UPHOLD SUCH
FICTIONS OF LAW AND NO Citizen is bound to obey such a FICTION OF
LAW. SUCH REGULATION OR LAW OPERATES AS A MERE NULLITY OR FICTION OF
LAW AS IF IT NEVER EXISTED IN LAW. No CITIZEN IS BOUND TO OBEY SUCH
UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW!!!!!
5)
The payment for a privilege requires a benifit to be received As the
RIGHT TO TRAVEL is already secured it is clearly unlawful to cite any
charges without direct damage to the specific party . Nor may a
Citizen be charged with an offense for the exercise of a
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, in this case the RIGHT TO TRAVEL. Please see
Miller vs. UNITED STATES 230 F2d 486 . Nor may a Citizen be
denied DUE PROCESS OF LAW or EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW.
6)
The undersigned does hereby claim, declare, and certify ANY AND ALL
their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS INVIOLATE from GOD and secured in THE
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION and the CONSTITUTION OF THE state wherein
they abode as a SOVEREIGN, COMMON LAW CITIZEN existing and acting
entirely AT THE COMMON LAW, and retains ALL BASIC RIGHTS under the
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATURE AND NATURE'S GOD
AND UNDER THE LAWS OF GOD THE SUPREME LAW GIVER.
7) ANY
VIOLATOR OF THE ABOVE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND CLAIM IS CRIMINALLY
TRESPASSING UPON THIS ABOVE NAMED COMMON LAW Citizen and WILL BE
PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT UNDER THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND.
BE WARNED OF THE TRESPASS AND THE ATTACHED CAVEATS. ALSO TAKE
CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE, IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NOT AN EXCUSE!!
SIGNATURE
OF THE ABOVE NOTED Common Law Citizen is
signed_________________________________________
WITNESS________________________________________
Date_______________
WITNESS________________________________________
Date_______________
or
NOTARY
PUBLIC_________________________________ MY COMMISSION
EXPIRES____________________________
Form
below use for County Clerk
state
of MICHIGAN
COUNTY
OF_______________
1,
___________________________________, CLERK of the County of
_____________________________________,
thereof do hereby certify the
Citizen
above named has sworn to the contents of this document and that
same
is TRUE AND CORRECT. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have
hereto
set my hand and affixed the SEAL of said CIRCUIT COURT, at
the
City of __________________________________ , MICHIGAN this
________________day
of_______________________, AD.__________
______________________________________Deputy
County Clerk for
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________COUNTY
CLERK
No comments:
Post a Comment