Beating the Internal Revenue Service

Beating the Internal Revenue Service

There is a man who used a simple technique

to beat the I.R.S. in a court battle and here is what he did

the documents you need is found in http://www.tarhakaarchives.org

Get rid of the I.R.S.

For those of you having IRS issues: 

I know someone who wishes to remain anonymous but wants his story out. I can 

attest to the hassles he went through with the IRS and know that it has been a 

long time since he has had to deal with them. Over a few years he has 

accumulated an enormous amount of documentation and had repeated 

communications with the IRS. They eventually dragged him into UNITED 

STATES DISTRICT COURT and during the trial he changed his direction and 

used Title 15 instead of Title 26 and the Constitution. The case eventually 

stopped.

His new contention was simple and in some ways similar to my charge concept, 

it is all about the bill not the law. Title 15 relates to "verified assessment", in other 

words the collector must provide proof to validate the debt and any case 

involving debt must be held in the judicial district court. The concept is that the 

evil ones have circumvented the Constitution and use their law, Title 26, as a 

way to confuse their victims. Tax law does not apply since the IRS is strictly a 

debt collection agency; thus they are required to follow Title 15. The IRS has no 

way to verify the debt even if they can verify taxes. W-2's and 1099's and other 

internal revenue service forms are only

 

evidence that some one has paid something, not that someone owes something. 

After reading all of Title 15 Chapter 41 Sub V section 1692 I can see his point 

is valid. Knowing that IRS is by corporate charter and their own admission a debt 

collection agency this all seems to make sense. I have started using this 

information in my own situation and will keep the group informed on the situation. 

This man told me he sent one letter, received a very uninformative denial 

response and sent a response to that response. This was done during his trial. 

He has not heard anything since, which was over a year ago. His case was 

terminated with no decision. I looked it up and the court just says CLOSED AND 

SEALED. I have not seen a case terminated this way.

For the solution to these type problems go to http://www.newfreehelpgroup.com